Spring naar de content

De PVV: meer NSB of Islamitische Staat?

In nog geen etmaal is de Partij van de Vrijheid van Geert Wilders vergeleken met zowel de Nationaal Socialistische Bond van Anton Mussert als terreurgroep Islamitische Staat van Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi.

Gepubliceerd op: Geplaatst in de volgende categorieën:
Geschreven door: De Redactie

In een interview met Trouw vergelijkt VVD-senator Sybe Schaap de PVV van vandaag met de NSB uit de vorige eeuw. Hij stelt dat PVV gevaarlijker is voor de democratie dan de NSB. “Bij de NSB hadden de leden vrij weinig in te brengen, maar Wilders gaat nog een stap verder: die wil zelfs geen leden.”

Abboneer op een lidmaadschap

Hoe sympathiek!

Dit artikel krijg je van HP/De Tijd cadeau. Om ons te steunen en meer artikelen van en uit HP/De Tijd te lezen, word je vanaf slechts vier euro per maand lid in minder dan een minuut. Voor dat luttele bedrag lees je ook alle stukken uit het maandelijkse magazine digitaal.

Kies een lidmaatschap

De tactiek die Wilders en de zijnen toepassen is volgens Schaap vergelijkbaar met de links-radicale vernieuwingsbeweging uit de jaren zestig en zeventig. “De PVV hitst het volk op de democratische instituties van hun macht maar vooral van hun gezag te ontdoen. PVV-ideoloog Martin Bosma eist dat rechters de wil van het volk uitvoeren. Griezelig.”

De uitspraak is gedrukt na een felle speech van de Jordaanse prins Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, Hoge Commissaris van de VN, tijdens een conferentie over veiligheid en justitie in Den Haag. Hij vergeleek de ‘angsttactieken’ van Wilders met die van Islamitische Staat, en bepleit dat populisten en demagogen in zowel Europa als de Verenigde Staten moeten worden aangepakt.

Al Hussein schaart Geert Wilders, aan wie zijn betoog geadresseerd is, in een rijtje met onder anderen de Amerikaanse Republikeinse presidentskandidaat Donald Trump, de Hongaarse premier Viktor Orbán, de Tsjechische president Milos Zeman, de Franse politica Marine le Pen en de Slowaakse premier Robert Fico.

De heel speech leest u hier:

“Dear Friends,

I wish to address this short statement to Mr. Geert Wilders, his acolytes, indeed to all those like him – the populists, demagogues and political fantasists.

To them, I must be a sort of nightmare. I am the global voice on human rights, universal rights; elected by all governments, and now critic of almost all governments. I defend and promote the human rights of each individual, everywhere: the rights of migrants, asylum seekers and immigrants; the rights of the LGBTi community; the rights of women and children in all countries; minorities; indigenous persons; people with disabilities, and any and all who are discriminated against, disadvantaged, persecuted or tortured – whether by governments, political movements or by terrorists.

I am a Muslim, who is, confusingly to racists, also white-skinned; whose mother is European and father, Arab. And I am angry, too. Because of Mr. Wilder’s lies and half-truths, manipulations and peddling of fear. You see, twenty years ago I served in the UN peacekeeping force during the Balkan wars – wars so cruel, so devastating, which flowed from this same factory of deceit, bigotry and ethnic nationalism.

Geert Wilders released his grotesque eleven-point manifesto only days ago, and a month ago he spoke along similar lines in Cleveland, in the United States. I will not repeat what he has said, but there are many who will, and his party is expected to do well in the elections in March.

And yet what Mr. Wilders shares in common with Mr. Trump, Mr. Orban, Mr. Zeman, Mr. Hofer, Mr. Fico, Madame Le Pen, Mr. Farage, he also shares with Da’esh.

All seek in varying degrees to recover a past, halcyon and so pure in form, where sunlit fields are settled by peoples united by ethnicity or religion – living peacefully in isolation, pilots of their fate, free of crime, foreign influence and war. A past that most certainly, in reality, did not exist anywhere, ever. Europe’s past, as we all know, was for centuries anything but that.

The proposition of recovering a supposedly perfect past is fiction; its merchants are cheats. Clever cheats.

Populists use half-truths and oversimplification — the two scalpels of the arch propagandist, and here the internet and social media are a perfect rail for them, by reducing thought into the smallest packages: sound-bites; tweets. Paint half a picture in the mind of an anxious individual, exposed as they may be to economic hardship and through the media to the horrors of terrorism. Prop this picture up by some half-truth here and there and allow the natural prejudice of people to fill in the rest. Add drama, emphasizing it’s all the fault of a clear-cut group, so the speakers lobbing this verbal artillery, and their followers, can feel somehow blameless.

The formula is therefore simple: make people, already nervous, feel terrible, and then emphasize it’s all because of a group, lying within, foreign and menacing. Then make your target audience feel good by offering up what is a fantasy to them, but a horrendous injustice to others. Inflame and quench, repeat many times over, until anxiety has been hardened into hatred.

Make no mistake, I certainly do not equate the actions of nationalist demagogues with those of Da’esh, which are monstrous, sickening; Da’esh must be brought to justice. But in its mode of communication, its use of half-truths and oversimplification, the propaganda of Da’esh uses tactics similar to those of the populists. And both sides of this equation benefit from each other – indeed would not expand in influence without each others’ actions.

The humiliating racial and religious prejudice fanned by the likes of Mr. Wilders has become in some countries municipal or even national policy. We hear of accelerating discrimination in workplaces. Children are being shamed and shunned for their ethnic and religious origins – whatever their passports, they are told they are not “really” European, not “really” French, or British, or Hungarian. Entire communities are being smeared with suspicion of collusion with terrorists.

History has perhaps taught Mr. Wilders and his ilk how effectively xenophobia and bigotry can be weaponized. Communities will barricade themselves into fearful, hostile camps, with populists like them, and the extremists, as the commandants. The atmosphere will become thick with hate; at this point it can descend rapidly into colossal violence.

We must pull back from this trajectory. My friends, are we doing enough to counter this cross-border bonding of demagogues? A decade ago, Geert Wilder’s manifesto and Cleveland speech would have created a world-wide furore. Now? Now, they are met with little more than a shrug, and, outside the Netherlands, his words and pernicious plans were barely noticed. Are we going to continue to stand by and watch this banalization of bigotry, until it reaches its logical conclusion?

Ultimately, it is the law that will safeguard our societies – human rights law, binding law which is the distillation of human experience, of generations of human suffering, the screams of the victims of past crimes and hate. We must guard this law passionately, and be guided by it.

Do not, my friends, be led by the deceiver. It is only by pursuing the entire truth, and acting wisely, that humanity can ever survive. So draw the line and speak. Speak out and up, speak the truth and do so compassionately, speak for your children, for those you care about, for the rights of all, and be sure to say clearly: stop! We will not be bullied by you the bully, nor fooled by you the deceiver, not again, no more; because we, not you, will steer our collective fate. And we, not you, will write and sculpt this coming century. Draw the line!”

De jarige Geert Wilders noemt de Verenigde Naties op zijn beurt ‘grotesk’ en stelt dat de VVD ‘islamofascisme’ mogelijk maakt.